<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Buy Avandia Without Prescription</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patents101.com/2009/01/what-is-the-examiners-motivation-part-1-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patents101.com/2009/01/what-is-the-examiners-motivation-part-1-2/</link>
	<description>Patents101, Hyra IP&#039;s Patents Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 16:53:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Buy Avandia Without Prescription</title>
		<link>http://patents101.com/2009/01/what-is-the-examiners-motivation-part-1-2/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Clifford D. Hyra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patents101.com/?p=58#comment-74</guid>
		<description>That is a good point.  It can be difficult to tell whether an Examiner is deliberately doing something or is being forced to do it by a primary or supervisor.  The production system is certainly not the only cause of poor examination.  However, Examiners will often try to clue you in when they are having trouble with the higher-ups, telling you they have to take your proposed amendment to their primary/SPE or telling you what their primary/SPE had to say about something.  

I&#039;ve even had examiners tell me straight out that their SPE told them they would never let them allow the case.  Obviously, at that point an appeal is in order.  Controlling the timing of your interviews and responses may be less useful under those circumstances, since the Examiner is not controlling the examination.  However, other tactics like interviews and appeals are invaluable as they may let you get directly to the supervisor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a good point.  It can be difficult to tell whether an Examiner is deliberately doing something or is being forced to do it by a primary or supervisor.  The production system is certainly not the only cause of poor examination.  However, Examiners will often try to clue you in when they are having trouble with the higher-ups, telling you they have to take your proposed amendment to their primary/SPE or telling you what their primary/SPE had to say about something.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve even had examiners tell me straight out that their SPE told them they would never let them allow the case.  Obviously, at that point an appeal is in order.  Controlling the timing of your interviews and responses may be less useful under those circumstances, since the Examiner is not controlling the examination.  However, other tactics like interviews and appeals are invaluable as they may let you get directly to the supervisor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Buy Avandia Without Prescription</title>
		<link>http://patents101.com/2009/01/what-is-the-examiners-motivation-part-1-2/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>jay ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 06:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patents101.com/?p=58#comment-73</guid>
		<description>When I worked at the PTO years ago, it was not uncommon for an Examinator to be willing to allow a case but to made to persist in an obtuse rejection by a supervisor.  Also, in addition to requiring production, all levels of PTO management would impose policies that made it difficult to allow cases (usually under the guise of &quot;quality.&quot;)  So it&#039;s not always the Examinator&#039;s decision when your client gets a boneheaded rejection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I worked at the PTO years ago, it was not uncommon for an Examinator to be willing to allow a case but to made to persist in an obtuse rejection by a supervisor.  Also, in addition to requiring production, all levels of PTO management would impose policies that made it difficult to allow cases (usually under the guise of &#8220;quality.&#8221;)  So it&#8217;s not always the Examinator&#8217;s decision when your client gets a boneheaded rejection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Buy Avandia Without Prescription</title>
		<link>http://patents101.com/2009/01/what-is-the-examiners-motivation-part-1-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>What is the Examiner&#8217;s Motivation? (Part 3)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patents101.com/?p=58#comment-11</guid>
		<description>[...] part 1, I introduced the performance system faced by Examiners and in part 2 I explained how this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] part 1, I introduced the performance system faced by Examiners and in part 2 I explained how this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Buy Avandia Without Prescription</title>
		<link>http://patents101.com/2009/01/what-is-the-examiners-motivation-part-1-2/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>What is the Examiner&#8217;s Motivation? (Part 2)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 01:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patents101.com/?p=58#comment-10</guid>
		<description>[...] part 2, I explore the effect of the Examiners&#8217; performance system on the patent prosecution process.  In theory, this may seem like a workable system in which the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] part 2, I explore the effect of the Examiners&#8217; performance system on the patent prosecution process.  In theory, this may seem like a workable system in which the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

