<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is a Design Patent?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patents101.com/2009/04/design-patent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patents101.com/2009/04/design-patent/</link>
	<description>Patents101, Hyra IP&#039;s Patents Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 03:37:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Comparison of Design Patents and Copyrights &#124; Patents101</title>
		<link>http://patents101.com/2009/04/design-patent/comment-page-1/#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>A Comparison of Design Patents and Copyrights &#124; Patents101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 19:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patents101.com/?p=341#comment-365</guid>
		<description>[...] Design patents protect the appearance of a variety of commercial objects.  Copyrights protect visual creative works (among other things), such as paintings and sculptures.  You may wonder whether copyright and design patent protection overlap or how to you decide which to use. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Design patents protect the appearance of a variety of commercial objects.  Copyrights protect visual creative works (among other things), such as paintings and sculptures.  You may wonder whether copyright and design patent protection overlap or how to you decide which to use. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clifford D. Hyra</title>
		<link>http://patents101.com/2009/04/design-patent/comment-page-1/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>Clifford D. Hyra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 07:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patents101.com/?p=341#comment-348</guid>
		<description>Andy,

Design patents protect the ornamental appearance of functional objects.  So a design patent could protect the ornamental appearance of a shoe sole, which is obviously functional.  However, if the appearance of the shoe sole is dictated primarily by functional considerations, in other words if it is shaped the way it is not merely for aesthetics, but because the shape improves one&#039;s posture, then that appearance cannot be protected by a design patent.  The appearance is then considered functional and not ornamental.  It still might be possible to get a design patent on an aesthetic pattern used on the surface of the shoe sole, but not on the shape of the sole itself.  

If this question relates to a real life issue for you and is not purely hypothetical, I very much encourage you to speak to your attorney.  This site is for informational purposes only and should not be relied on as legal advice, which it is not.  I am only explaining the general meaning of the laws and not their applicability to any specific factual circumstances.  For example, the question of whether the appearance of an object is dictated primarily by functional considerations is a factual one that should be determined on a case-by-case basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy,</p>
<p>Design patents protect the ornamental appearance of functional objects.  So a design patent could protect the ornamental appearance of a shoe sole, which is obviously functional.  However, if the appearance of the shoe sole is dictated primarily by functional considerations, in other words if it is shaped the way it is not merely for aesthetics, but because the shape improves one&#8217;s posture, then that appearance cannot be protected by a design patent.  The appearance is then considered functional and not ornamental.  It still might be possible to get a design patent on an aesthetic pattern used on the surface of the shoe sole, but not on the shape of the sole itself.  </p>
<p>If this question relates to a real life issue for you and is not purely hypothetical, I very much encourage you to speak to your attorney.  This site is for informational purposes only and should not be relied on as legal advice, which it is not.  I am only explaining the general meaning of the laws and not their applicability to any specific factual circumstances.  For example, the question of whether the appearance of an object is dictated primarily by functional considerations is a factual one that should be determined on a case-by-case basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://patents101.com/2009/04/design-patent/comment-page-1/#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 17:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patents101.com/?p=341#comment-344</guid>
		<description>Do design patents protect a shoe sole that has a function of improving one&#039;s posture?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do design patents protect a shoe sole that has a function of improving one&#8217;s posture?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Comparison of Design Patents and Utility Patents &#124; Patents101</title>
		<link>http://patents101.com/2009/04/design-patent/comment-page-1/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>A Comparison of Design Patents and Utility Patents &#124; Patents101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 11:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patents101.com/?p=341#comment-336</guid>
		<description>[...] Design patents differ from utility patents (what we usually think of, when we think of patents), in several important ways.  The main difference is that utility patents protect the functionality of a useful invention, whereas design patents protect only the appearance of an object. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Design patents differ from utility patents (what we usually think of, when we think of patents), in several important ways.  The main difference is that utility patents protect the functionality of a useful invention, whereas design patents protect only the appearance of an object. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

