<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Patents101 &#187; Trademark Registration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patents101.com/category/trademarks/trademark-registration-trademarks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patents101.com</link>
	<description>Patents101, Hyra IP&#039;s Patents Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 14:52:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Do I Have to Offer My Services in Multiple States to Get a Federal Trademark Registration?</title>
		<link>http://patents101.com/2010/05/services-in-multiple-states-federal-trademark-registration/</link>
		<comments>http://patents101.com/2010/05/services-in-multiple-states-federal-trademark-registration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 13:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clifford D. Hyra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademark Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Examination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patents101.com/?p=608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As discussed in this post, the United States Patent and Trademark Office will not register your trademark until you begin using it in commerce. For a trademark used in connection with services (a service mark), &#8220;use in commerce&#8221; require both that you have displayed your trademark in the advertisement of your services and that you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As discussed in <a href="http://patents101.com/2010/05/use-in-commerce-service-mark/" target="_blank">this post</a>, the United States Patent and Trademark Office will not register your trademark until you begin using it in commerce. For a trademark used in connection with services (a service mark), &#8220;use in commerce&#8221; require both that you have displayed your trademark in the advertisement of your services <span style="text-decoration: underline;">and</span> that you render your services in commerce <span style="text-decoration: underline;">or</span> in multiple states <span style="text-decoration: underline;">or</span> the U.S. and a  foreign country. <a href="http://tess2.uspto.gov/tmdb/tmep/0900.htm#_T901" target="_blank">TMEP § 901.01</a></p>
<p>So, rendering (offering) your services in multiple states satisfies this requirement. Yet also it seems that the requirement can be met without offering your services in multiple states or in multiple countries, by &#8220;rendering your services in commerce.&#8221;</p>
<h3><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Rendering Trademarked Services in Commerce</span></h3>
<p>So what the heck does rendering the services in  commerce mean? Well, only trademarks used in interstate commerce are  entitled to federal trademark registration, because the federal  government only has the power to regulate interstate commerce (it&#8217;s in  the Constitution!). &#8220;In commerce&#8221; here is differentiated from commerce  in multiple states or in the U.S. and a foreign country, so it mean  intrastate service that nevertheless qualifies as &#8220;interstate&#8221; commerce.</p>
<h4>Intrastate Hotel, Dining, and Automotive Services Are Interstate Commerce</h4>
<p>The TMEP explains: &#8220;if intrastate use directly affects a type of  commerce that Congress may regulate, this constitutes use in commerce  within the  meaning of the Act.&#8221; <a href="http://tess2.uspto.gov/tmdb/tmep/0900.htm#_T90103" target="_blank">TMEP § 901.03</a>. Thus, automotive, restaurant, and hotel services are generally considered to be used in commerce because they are available to customers traveling interstate on federal highways, and thus are subject to federal regulation.</p>
<h4>Intrastate Services That Target or Serve Out-of-State Customers Qualify As Interstate  Commerce</h4>
<p>Other services offered in only a single state may also be considered to be rendered in commerce if a sufficient inter-state nexus can be shown. Evidence that the services are advertised in multiple states or are used by residents of different states is effective in demonstrating that the services have been rendered in commerce.</p>
<h4>Internet Services Are Interstate Commerce</h4>
<p>Services offered over the Internet are considered interstate commerce, &#8220;since the services are available to a national and international  audience who must use interstate telephone lines to access a  website.&#8221; <a href="http://tess2.uspto.gov/tmdb/tmep/0900.htm#_T90103" target="_blank">TMEP  § 901.03</a></p>
<h3><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Summary</span></h3>
<p>In order to register your trademark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, you must use your trademark in connection with services offered in interstate commerce. That means the services must either be offered in multiple states, or in the U.S. and a foreign country, or that the services are offered in a single state, but to out-of-state customers.</p>
<p>And if your services do not fall under any of those possibilities, but you can think of another way to tie your services to interstate commerce, the Trademark Office could allow your trademark to be registered as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://patents101.com/2010/05/services-in-multiple-states-federal-trademark-registration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is Use in Commerce for a Service Mark?</title>
		<link>http://patents101.com/2010/05/use-in-commerce-service-mark/</link>
		<comments>http://patents101.com/2010/05/use-in-commerce-service-mark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 04:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clifford D. Hyra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademark Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patents101.com/?p=606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While an application to register your trademark can be filed before the  mark is used (as long as you have an intent to use it in the future), the Trademark Office will not issue you a registration until you actually use your trademark in commerce.
So what does it mean to use a trademark &#8220;in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While an application to register your trademark can be filed before the  mark is used (as long as you have an intent to use it in the future), the Trademark Office will not issue you a registration until you actually use your trademark in commerce.</p>
<p>So what does it mean to use a trademark &#8220;in commerce&#8221;? Is it sufficient to use your trademark on your website? The answer is, sometimes yes and sometimes no. It depends on whether your mark is a plain old trademark or a service mark. A service mark is a trademark that is used to sell services, rather than physical products.</p>
<p>To register a service mark, you must show that you have used the mark in the advertisement or sale of a service to prospective customers and that you were prepared to provide the service at the time of the advertisement.</p>
<h3><span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Rule Regarding Use in Commerce of a Service Mark</span></h3>
<p><a href="http://tess2.uspto.gov/tmdb/tmep/0900.htm#_T901" target="_blank">TMEP § 901.01</a> states that &#8220;a mark shall be deemed to be in use in commerce&#8230;    on services when it is used or displayed in the sale or advertising of services and the services are rendered in commerce, or  the services are rendered in more than one State or in the United States and  a foreign country and the person rendering the services is engaged in  commerce in connection with the services.&#8221;</p>
<p>In other words, for a service mark use in commerce requires:</p>
<ol>
<li>Display of the service mark in the sale or advertisement of services, and</li>
<li>Rendering the services in commerce <span style="text-decoration: underline;">or</span> in multiple states <span style="text-decoration: underline;">or</span> the U.S. and a foreign country</li>
</ol>
<p>Let us ignore the second part of #2 for now (it&#8217;s a doozy) and parse the rest of that.</p>
<h3><span style="text-decoration: underline;">1) Display of the Service Mark in the Sale or Advertising of Services</span></h3>
<p>To successfully claim use of your service mark and achieve a federal registration, you must show that you have used your mark in an advertisement or sale of your services. This is generally an easy requirement to fulfill. Display of your service mark on your website, where your website advertises your services, generally <span style="text-decoration: underline;">is</span> sufficient to satisfy it, and is the most popular way to do so.</p>
<h4><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Advertisements Are Not Sufficient to Show Use in Commerce For Trademarks</span></h4>
<p>Note that this is in contrast to the rule for trademarks (used on goods/products), where use in an advertisement is NOT sufficient and therefore use on a website often does NOT satisfy the requirement. Many business owners get in trouble with this distinction and do not understand why their website is not sufficient to show use. Nevertheless, it usually is not (consult your attorney to find out for sure).</p>
<h4><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Mere Preparation to Use Is Not Sufficient to Show Use in Commerce of  a Service Mark</span></h4>
<p>What does not satisfy this requirement is preparation to use the service mark. “[m]ere adoption (selection) of a mark accompanied by preparations to begin its use are insufficient . . . for claiming ownership of and applying<br />
to register the mark.” <a href="http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/08-1154.pdf" target="_blank"><em>Aycock Engineering, Inc.,  v. Airflite, Inc.</em></a>, (Fed. Cir. 2009) (citing Intermed, 197 USPQ at 507).</p>
<p>Such acts as soliciting the support of others, issuing a detailed announcement using the service mark to inform and update individuals about the service’s status, and hiring a fundraising firm to raise money for the service are insufficient.</p>
<h4><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Use in Commerce Requires Advertisement or Sale to Customers </span></h4>
<p>Advertising your service to potential partners, investors, or affiliates is not sufficient to show use in commerce. Rather, &#8220;there must be an open and notorious public offering of the services  to those <span style="text-decoration: underline;">for whom the services are intended</span>.” <a href="http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/08-1154.pdf" target="_blank"><em>Aycock  Engineering, Inc.,  v. Airflite, Inc.</em></a>, (Fed. Cir. 2009) (citing  Intermed, 197 USPQ at 507)(emphasis added).</p>
<h3><span style="text-decoration: underline;">2) Rendering the Services</span></h3>
<p>Mere advertisement of your services, in and of itself, is <span style="text-decoration: underline;">not</span> sufficient to satisfy the federal trademark registration requirement of use in commerce for service marks. You must also actually be prepared to provide the services you are advertising.</p>
<h4><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Advertising a Service You Will Soon Provide is NOT Sufficient</span></span></h4>
<p>&#8220;Without question, advertising or publicizing a service that the applicant intends to perform in the future will not support registration. Instead, the advertising or publicizing must relate to &#8216;an existing service which has already been offered to the public&#8217;&#8230; The use in advertising which creates a right in a service mark must be advertising which relates to an existing service which has already been offered to the public.&#8221; <a href="http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/08-1154.pdf" target="_blank"><em>Aycock  Engineering, Inc.,  v. Airflite, Inc.</em></a>,  (Fed. Cir. 2009) (citing Greyhound Corp. v. Armour Life Ins. Co., 214 USPQ 473, 474 (TTAB 1982))</p>
<h4><span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Services Advertised and Rendered Must Be The Services Listed in Your Trademark Application</span></h4>
<p>Be careful when listing the services you provide or intent to provide. You will have to show that you have advertised and are ready to perform THOSE services. The listed services (or goods) can be changed, but only to narrow or clarify what you have listed, and never to broaden the list.</p>
<p>Thus, going from &#8220;Clothes&#8221; to &#8220;shirts&#8221; is okay, but going from &#8220;shirts&#8221; to &#8220;clothes&#8221; is not. That is one reason to leave your listing of services broad if you can, particularly if you are uncertain exactly how to describe the services you are offering or what service you actually will provide.</p>
<p>In <em>Aycock Engineering</em>, the registrant&#8217;s federal trademark registration was canceled because his activities did &#8220;not constitute a service that falls within the scope of our definition of the recitation of services.&#8221; Mr. Aycock&#8217;s listed services covered  &#8220;only the arranging of flights between an air taxi operator and a passenger&#8221;, whereas his activities involved &#8220;efforts to arrange a network of air taxi operators.&#8221;</p>
<h3><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Conclusion</span></h3>
<p>The failure to properly show use in commerce of your trademark can result in rejection of your application for registration or cancellation of your federal registration years later. Do not take chances with formalities like these, work with a trademark attorney early on to ensure the strength of your trademark rights, and learn from the mistakes of others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://patents101.com/2010/05/use-in-commerce-service-mark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can I Revive or Reinstate My Trademark Registration If I Forget to Renew It?</title>
		<link>http://patents101.com/2010/02/reinstate-trademark-registration/</link>
		<comments>http://patents101.com/2010/02/reinstate-trademark-registration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 04:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clifford D. Hyra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademark Post-Registration Procedures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patents101.com/?p=576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Renewal of Trademark Registrations
A trademark registration expires after ten years. If you wish to keep your trademark registration active, you must file an Application for Renewal of your registration under § 9 (See TMEP § 1606 ) before the expiration of this ten year period.
The window for filing this Renewal opens one year before expiration [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Renewal of Trademark Registrations</span></h3>
<p>A trademark registration expires after ten years. If you wish to keep your trademark registration active, you must file an Application for Renewal of your registration under § 9 (See<a href="http://tess2.uspto.gov/tmdb/tmep/1600.htm#_T1606" target="_blank"> TMEP § 1606</a> ) before the expiration of this ten year period.</p>
<p>The window for filing this Renewal opens one year before expiration of the mark and a Renewal may also be filed within six months after the expiration of your mark (the “grace period”) with an additional fee. Thus, you may file a Renewal any time between nine and ten years after registration, or between ten and ten and a half years after registration with payment of the additional fee. A declaration or affidavit of continued use under § 8 must also be filed within the same period as the Application for Renewal of registration (See <a href="http://tess2.uspto.gov/tmdb/tmep/1600.htm#_T1604" target="_blank">TMEP </a><a href="http://tess2.uspto.gov/tmdb/tmep/1600.htm#_T1606" target="_blank">§ </a><a href="http://tess2.uspto.gov/tmdb/tmep/1600.htm#_T1604" target="_blank">1604</a>).</p>
<p>Each Renewal extends the life of the registration for ten years, thus a new Renewal must be filed before the end of twenty years after registration, thirty years, etc., if you do not wish for your registration to expire.</p>
<h3><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Reinstating a Trademark Registration</span></h3>
<p>If you forget about the renewal and miss the ten-and-a-half year deadline, your registration will expire. In that case, there is <span style="text-decoration: underline;">no way</span> to revive or reinstate it. Your registration is simply gone and if you want another one, you will have to file a new application and undergo examination once again. Examiners are not bound by previous registration decisions of the Trademark Office, so you could encounter some difficulty with your new application.</p>
<p>The only time that a trademark registration can be reinstated once it has expired for failure to file a renewal application or declaration of use is if you <span style="text-decoration: underline;">did</span> file the required documents and the expiration was due to a Trademark Office error (See <a href="http://tess2.uspto.gov/tmdb/tmep/1700.htm#_T171202" target="_blank">TMEP § 1712.02</a>). If, for example, the Trademark Office lost the paperwork, you would be able to reinstate your registration.</p>
<p>In that case, a request for reinstatement  must be filed within two months of receiving notice that your registration was canceled.</p>
<p>So, be careful not to miss any deadlines! The Trademark Office will not warn you when they are approaching. Consider using a trademark attorney or trademark management company to keep track of the deadlines for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://patents101.com/2010/02/reinstate-trademark-registration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What if My New Trademark or Business Name is Already in Use?</title>
		<link>http://patents101.com/2010/01/trademark-business-name-in-use/</link>
		<comments>http://patents101.com/2010/01/trademark-business-name-in-use/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 04:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clifford D. Hyra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademark Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patents101.com/?p=544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So you have come up with a name for your new business or new product, and you love it. It is the perfect brand and trademark to propel your business to widespread success. But wisely, you have a trademark search conducted, and you find that you are not the first person to come up with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you have come up with a name for your new business or new product, and you love it. It is the perfect brand and trademark to propel your business to widespread success. But wisely, you have a trademark search conducted, and you find that you are not the first person to come up with it. Your new name is not quite as unique or original as you had hoped- some other business is using a similar name. We will call that other business &#8220;First User, Inc.&#8221;</p>
<p>What should you do? Do you have to drop the name? Change it? Contact First User? Or can you just go ahead with your registration and marketing plans as if nothing had changed? There are a few factors you must weight when making that decision:</p>
<ol style="padding-left: 60px;">
<li>What First User can do to you if they find out you are using a similar trademark</li>
<li>How likely First User is to find out or decide to go after you</li>
<li>Just how good the name you came up with is</li>
</ol>
<p>The first factor is the potential cost to you of using the trademark, the second is the probability of incurring that cost, and the third factor is the benefit from using that trademark. You can then make the classic calculation: is the potential cost multiplied by the probability of incurring that cost greater than the expected benefit to you?</p>
<h3>1) Penalties for Trademark Infringement</h3>
<p>If you decide to begin using a trademark (business name, logo, brand name, etc.) that is <a href="http://patents101.com/2009/02/is-my-trademark-being-infringed-am-i-infringing-someone-elses-trademark/" target="_blank">confusingly similar</a> to the trademark of another business in the U.S., that other business can cause you a lot of problems. It can stop you from registering your trademark and it may be able to stop you from using the trademark.</p>
<ul style="padding-left: 60px;">
<li>
<h4><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Preventing You From Registering Your Trademark</span></h4>
</li>
</ul>
<h4 style="padding-left: 60px;">Trademark Examining Attorney Refusal to Register</h4>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">The Trademark Office will not register a trademark if it is confusingly similar to another registered trademark. Therefore, if First User has registered their trademark, it may be difficult for you to get your application allowed by the PTO. The Trademark Examining Attorney assigned to your application is likely to refuse registration of your mark.</p>
<h4 style="padding-left: 60px;">Trademark Opposition / Cancellation</h4>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">Even if the PTO allows your trademark application, First User can oppose your registration, regardless of whether it has a registration and regardless of where in the U.S. it is located. A trademark opposition is an administrative proceeding before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) and is essentially a mini-trial.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">To go all the way through an opposition you can expect to spend $50,000 to $100,000, depending on what law firm you use. If First User can prove that your mark is confusingly similar to theirs and that it began using the mark in commerce before you, it is likely to succeed in preventing your registration.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">Even if your mark is successfully registered without an opposition, First User can come back and petition to cancel your registration up to five years later. A cancellation proceeding is very similar to an opposition in expense, etc.</p>
<ul style="padding-left: 60px;">
<li>
<h4><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Preventing You From Using Your Trademark</span></h4>
</li>
</ul>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">Although <a href="http://patents101.com/2009/02/why-should-i-register-my-trademark/" target="_blank">registering your trademark is very important</a>, the right to use your trademark is even more important. If First User has registered their trademark, they have exclusive rights to that mark nationwide. Regardless of whether you are operating in the same geographic area, your use of a confusingly similar mark in the United States constitutes trademark infringement.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">In that case, First User can sue you and, if it can prove confusing similarity, force you to stop using your trademark. You would then have to redo your marketing materials and marketing campaign and devote a lot of money to rebranding.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">As you are probably beginning to understand, it is generally a bad idea to use a trademark that seriously conflicts with an existing registered trademark. More frequently, you will have to make a decision regarding a trademark that is used by another business, but not registered. In that case, you can only be sued for trademark infringement if you do business in the same geographic area as First User, and only in state court. First User will have to prove confusing similarity and first use.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">Defending a trademark infringement lawsuit can easily run six figures. Monetary damages could also be awarded against you, although they are uncommon.</p>
<h3>2) Likelihood That Trademark Infringement Will Be Discovered or Prosecuted</h3>
<p>Whether First User is likely to discover your use of a similar mark or pursue you if they do depends on a number of factors, including:</p>
<ul>
<li>Is First User big or small?</li>
<li>Is First User brand-focused?</li>
<li>How close are the marks / how strong is First User&#8217;s legal position?</li>
<li>Does First User do business in your geographic area?</li>
<li>Do you have a significant web presence?</li>
<li>Is First User a direct competitor?</li>
<li>How big will your business become, and how fast?</li>
</ul>
<p>These factors will be discussed in more depth in a subsequent post. Generally, large corporations are very likely to find out about trademark infringement and take action, whereas very small businesses are very unlikely to.</p>
<p>If you are able to register your trademark and keep that registration for five years, your registration will become incontestable, meaning that First User will no longer be able to cancel it for confusing similarity to their own mark. Your registration will also allow you to prevent First User from expanding beyond their geographic area.</p>
<h3>3) How Important Is It To Keep Your Trademark?</h3>
<p>Finally, you should consider the importance of the trademark you have selected. Are you wedded to it? Would you be open to tweaking it in order to differentiate it from First User&#8217;s trademark? If there are good alternatives and you have nto spent much money on putting together your branding materials, often it is better to avoid potential conflicts by choosing a new trademark.</p>
<p>On the other hand, if you have a really good and meaningful trademark that you have spent money to develop and build a marketing campaign around, it may be worth taking the risk of going ahead with it. This is particularly true when the risk is low, for example if First User is a small business that is not a direct competitor and is unlikely to discover the similarity.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">
<p style="padding-left: 90px;">
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://patents101.com/2010/01/trademark-business-name-in-use/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trademark Basics for Businesses</title>
		<link>http://patents101.com/2009/11/trademark-basics-for-businesses/</link>
		<comments>http://patents101.com/2009/11/trademark-basics-for-businesses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 23:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clifford D. Hyra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademark Registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patents101.com/?p=505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently recorded the following video for Legal River concerning the basics of trademarks for business owners (and others!)


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently recorded the following video for Legal River concerning the basics of trademarks for business owners (and others!)</p>
<p><center><br />
<object width="400" height="220"><param name="wmode" value="opaque" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7043658&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=0&amp;show_byline=0&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=00ADEF&amp;fullscreen=1" /><embed wmode="opaque" src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7043658&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=0&amp;show_byline=0&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=00ADEF&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="400" height="220"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://patents101.com/2009/11/trademark-basics-for-businesses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Can I Protect My Trademarks In Foreign Countries? (Part 4, Madrid Applications Cont.)</title>
		<link>http://patents101.com/2009/08/protect-trademarks-foreign-countries-4-madrid/</link>
		<comments>http://patents101.com/2009/08/protect-trademarks-foreign-countries-4-madrid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clifford D. Hyra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Trademark Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Post-Registration Procedures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patents101.com/?p=449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Part 1, I introduced the concept of international trademark protection and the option of filing a separate trademark application in each country of interest. In Part 2, I introduced the Madrid System, whereby a single international trademark application can be filed for registration in a number of countries. In Part 3, I continued the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="../2009/07/protect-trademarks-foreign-countries/" target="_blank">Part 1</a>, I introduced the concept of international trademark protection and the option of filing a separate trademark application in each country of interest. In <a href="../2009/08/protect-trademarks-foreign-countries-madrid/" target="_blank">Part 2</a>, I introduced the Madrid System, whereby a single international trademark application can be filed for registration in a number of countries. In <a href="http://patents101.com/2009/08/protect-trademarks-foreign-countries-part-3-madrid/" target="_blank">Part 3</a>, I continued the explanation and analysis of the Madrid System by detailing who can file using the Madrid System and in what countries trademark protection can be obtained.</p>
<p>In Part 4, the concluding post of this series, I examine the advantages and disadvantages of the Madrid System and make a cost comparison with ordinary filings.</p>
<h3><span style="text-decoration: underline;">What Are the Advantages and Disadvantages of Filing an Application Under the Madrid Protocol or Agreement?</span></h3>
<p>The main advantage of using an international application is the reduction in time and expense over filing multiple individual applications. Only one application has to be prepared and submitted, which saves more time and attorney&#8217;s fees the more countries you want protection in. You only need to use one law firm, your domestic firm, unless you have a problem in one of the individual countries, reducing the number of lawyers you have to pay.</p>
<p>The system also greatly simplifies administrative tasks like making changes to the name or address of the applicant or renewing foreign registrations. With the Madrid System, such changes can be made across all countries of registration with a single administrative process, saving a great deal of time and money and reducing the chances of overlooking an application or making a mistake in one of the filings.</p>
<p>The main disadvantage is that an international application is <a href="http://www.wipo.int/madrid/en/general/#dependence" target="_blank">dependent</a> on the domestic application or registration on which it is based. A refusal, withdrawal or cancellation of the domestic application or registration within five years of the registration date of the international registration will result in the refusal, withdrawal or cancellation of the international registration to the same extent. This leaves the trademark owner vulnerable to a &#8220;central attack&#8221; of its trademark in the country of origin.</p>
<h3><span style="text-decoration: underline;">What is the Cost of an Application under the Madrid Protocol or Agreement?</span></h3>
<p>There is an initial fee charged by the country of origin for receiving, certifying, and transmitting the itnernational applicaiton. In the United States, this fee is $100. The applicant must also pay fees <a href="http://www.wipo.int/madrid/en/fees/about_fees.html" target="_blank">directly to WIPO</a> to cover both its examination and the examination conducted bye ach of the designated countries.</p>
<p>The schedule of fees due under the Madrid System can be found <a href="http://www.wipo.int/madrid/en/fees/sched.html" target="_blank">here</a> and the fees of individual designated countries can be found <a href="http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/madridgazette/en/remarks/ind_taxes.html" target="_blank">here</a>. These fees are charged in Swiss francs (CHF) and generally are 653 CHF for an application without color in up to three classes, or 903 CHF for a color mark, plus an additional 100 CHF for each designated Contracting Party (country). Some countries, as indicated <a href="http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/madridgazette/en/remarks/ind_taxes.html" target="_blank">here</a>, charge their own fee for their designation instead of the default 100 CHF. The Swiss franc at the time of this post was 0.92 USD.</p>
<p>As an example, the cost of filing an international trademark application for a black and white mark in the United States designating China, Japan, and Korea would be $100 + 653 CHF + 310 CHF (China&#8217;s individual fee) + 140 CHF (Japan&#8217;s individual fee) + 223 CHF (Korea&#8217;s individual fee). The total official fees would therefore be approximately $1220. Add in the cost of your U.S. attorney and you are looking at $1,500-$2,000. By way of comparison, you can expect to pay $1,500-$2,000 for each application if submitted individually.</p>
<p>Thus, even when only a few countries are designated and even where these countries charge more than the typical 100 CHF, an international application can result in significant cost savings. Add in the savings from future renewals and other administrative costs and the difference becomes even more substantial.</p>
<p>Thus, in many instances making use of the Madrid System to achieve international trademark protection can greatly reduce your expense and decrease the likelihood of errors. In most cases these advantages outwiegh the disadvantage of vulnerability to central attack, making Madrid applications a valuable tool in your trademark arsenal.</p>
<p>Leave your questions and additions in the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://patents101.com/2009/08/protect-trademarks-foreign-countries-4-madrid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Can I Protect My Trademarks In Foreign Countries? (Part 3, Madrid Applications Cont.)</title>
		<link>http://patents101.com/2009/08/protect-trademarks-foreign-countries-part-3-madrid/</link>
		<comments>http://patents101.com/2009/08/protect-trademarks-foreign-countries-part-3-madrid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clifford D. Hyra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Trademark Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patents101.com/?p=444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Part 1, I introduced the concept of international trademark protection and the option of filing a separate trademark application in each country of interest. In Part 2, I introduced the Madrid System, whereby a single international trademark application can be filed for registration in a number of countries.
In this post, Part 3, I will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://patents101.com/2009/07/protect-trademarks-foreign-countries/" target="_blank">Part 1</a>, I introduced the concept of international trademark protection and the option of filing a separate trademark application in each country of interest. In <a href="http://patents101.com/2009/08/protect-trademarks-foreign-countries-madrid/" target="_blank">Part 2</a>, I introduced the Madrid System, whereby a single international trademark application can be filed for registration in a number of countries.</p>
<p>In this post, Part 3, I will continue the explanation and analysis of the Madrid System by detailing who can file using the Madrid System and in what countries trademark protection can be obtained. In <a href="http://patents101.com/2009/08/protect-trademarks-foreign-countries-4-madrid/" target="_blank">Part 4</a>, the concluding post, I examine the advantages and disadvantages of the Madrid System and make a cost comparison with ordinary filings.</p>
<h3><span style="text-decoration: underline;">What Countries Participate in the Madrid System?</span></h3>
<p>There are 84 members of the Madrid Union (countries who are members of the Madrid Protocol and/or Madrid Agreement). The Madrid Protocol boasts 74 members and the Madrid agreement 56- 46 countries are members of both. The full list of member countries can be found <a href="http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/treaties/en/documents/pdf/madrid_marks.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>. An international application under the Madrid System must originate in a member country and each country designated for protection in the application must also be a member.</p>
<p>The United States is a member of the Madrid Protocol, but not the Madrid Agreement, and therefore U.S. applicants may not designate countries that are members of the Madrid Agreement only.</p>
<p>Some countries that are <span style="text-decoration: underline;">not</span> members of the Madrid Union include Canada, Mexico, New Zealand, South Africa, India, Pakistan, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Malaysia, the Philippines, Indonesia, Thailand, Israel, and most of Latin America. Trademark protection in these countries can only be achieved by <a href="http://patents101.com/2009/07/protect-trademarks-foreign-countries/" target="_blank">individual applications</a>.</p>
<h3><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Who Can File an Application Under the Madrid System?</span></h3>
<p>An applicant using the Madrid System must be &#8220;a natural person or a legal entity which has a real and effective industrial or commercial establishment in, or is domiciled in, or is a national of&#8221; a country that is a signatory to the Madrid Agreement or Protocol. The applicant must initiate their international application in such a country.</p>
<p>On to <a href="http://patents101.com/2009/08/protect-trademarks-foreign-countries-4-madrid/" target="_self">Part 4</a>&#8230; If you have any questions or additions to the material above, let me know in the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://patents101.com/2009/08/protect-trademarks-foreign-countries-part-3-madrid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Can I Protect My Trademarks In Foreign Countries? (Part 2, Madrid Applications)</title>
		<link>http://patents101.com/2009/08/protect-trademarks-foreign-countries-madrid/</link>
		<comments>http://patents101.com/2009/08/protect-trademarks-foreign-countries-madrid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clifford D. Hyra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Examination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patents101.com/?p=434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Part 1, you learned that you can register your trademark in foreign country by submitting individual applications in each country desired under the rules of that country. In Part 2, you will learn about a less expensive and time-consuming way of achieving the same coverage by utilizing the Madrid System, a set of international [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://patents101.com/2009/07/protect-trademarks-foreign-countries/" target="_blank">Part 1</a>, you learned that you can register your trademark in foreign country by submitting individual applications in each country desired under the rules of that country. In Part 2, you will learn about a less expensive and time-consuming way of achieving the same coverage by utilizing the Madrid System, a set of international agreements.</p>
<p><a href="http://patents101.com/2009/08/protect-trademarks-foreign-countries-part-3-madrid/" target="_blank">Part 3</a> expands on the exploration of the Madrid System by explaining who can get trademark protection by using the Madrid System and in what countries. <a href="http://patents101.com/2009/08/protect-trademarks-foreign-countries-4-madrid/" target="_blank">Part 4</a> details some advantages and disadvantages to using international applications under the Madrid System.</p>
<h3><span style="text-decoration: underline;">What is the Madrid System?</span></h3>
<p>The Madrid system is a combination of two international agreements, the Madrid Agreement and the Madrid Protocol. The countries that have signed these agreements grant reciprocal rights to one another with regard to applications for trademark registration. Each allows an applicant to submit a single international application designating a number of countries in which trademark protection is desired.</p>
<p>This international application is examined individually by each designated country to determine whether the trademark is entitled to protection under the laws of that country. To use the Madrid Protocol or Agreement, both the country of origin and each desired foreign country must be signatories of the same agreement.</p>
<h3><span style="text-decoration: underline;">What are the Madrid Examination Procedures?</span></h3>
<p>To file an international application, there must first be a domestic (or &#8220;basic&#8221;) trademark application or registration. Under the Madrid Agreement, only trademark registrations can be the basis for an international application, not applications. This is the primary difference between the two agreements and the reason that the Madrid Protocol is more popular. The international application must be filed in the same country as the basic application or registration.</p>
<p>This &#8220;Office of Origin&#8221; receives and certifies the international application and then transmits it to the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization (<a href="http://www.wipo.int/portal/index.html.en" target="_blank">WIPO</a>), which administers the Madrid System, for processing and initial examination.</p>
<p>The application is examined by WIPO to ensure that the application complies with the requirements of the Madrid System, including those relating to the listing of goods and services and their classification, and that the required fees have been paid. The Office of Origin and the applicant are informed of any irregularities, which must be remedied within three months to avoid abandonment. When the international application is in compliance, the mark is recorded in the International Register and published in the Gazette.</p>
<p>WIPO then notifies each Contracting Party in which protection has been requested and the application is then examined by each designated country individually. Each country&#8217;s trademark office applies its own rules in evaluating the application and is free to accept or reject it on its own terms. Any subsequent interaction with a foreign trademark office is conducted directly between the applicant and the office as normal, and will typically require the assistance of counsel in the country in which the office is located.</p>
<p>On to <a href="http://patents101.com/2009/08/protect-trademarks-foreign-countries-part-3-madrid/" target="_blank">Part 3</a>- Madrid Union Membership</p>
<h3><span style="text-decoration: underline;">More Madrid Protocol and Madrid Agreement Resources</span></h3>
<p>The WIPO <a href="http://www.wipo.int/madrid/en/" target="_blank">Madrid System for the International Registration of Marks</a> page</p>
<p>The USPTO <a href="http://www.uspto.gov/web/trademarks/madrid/madridfaqs.htm">Madrid FAQ</a> page</p>
<p>The Wikipedia <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madrid_system" target="_blank">Madrid System</a> entry</p>
<p>Anything I left out? Please leave your questions in the comments, or you can ask me directly on twitter, facebook, or by phone or email.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://patents101.com/2009/08/protect-trademarks-foreign-countries-madrid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Can I Protect My Trademarks In Foreign Countries? (Part 1, Regular Applications)</title>
		<link>http://patents101.com/2009/07/protect-trademarks-foreign-countries/</link>
		<comments>http://patents101.com/2009/07/protect-trademarks-foreign-countries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clifford D. Hyra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patents101.com/?p=430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Each country generally maintains its own trademark register. Registering your trademark gives you a number of benefits, but only within the country in which it is registered. If you intend to sell your product in multiple countries, you really need trademark protection in all of them.
Your first step should be applying to register your mark [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Each country generally maintains its own trademark register. Registering your trademark gives you <a href="http://patents101.com/2009/02/why-should-i-register-my-trademark/" target="_blank">a number of benefits</a>, but only within the country in which it is registered. If you intend to sell your product in multiple countries, you really need trademark protection in all of them.</p>
<p>Your first step should be applying to register your mark in your home country (assuming you will do business there). Then you have a choice- you can file individual applications in each country you need, or you can file an international application under the Madrid Agreement/Protocol. This post explains the use of individual, regular applications, where <a href="http://patents101.com/2009/08/protect-trademarks-foreign-countries-madrid/" target="_blank">the next post</a> will delve into the details of international trademark applications.</p>
<h3 style="text-align: center;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Applying for Trademark Registration in Individual Foreign Countries</span></h3>
<h4 style="text-align: left;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Foreign Registration Procedure<br />
</span></h4>
<p>A U.S. attorney cannot file a trademark application overseas. For that, you need a lawyer of the country in which the application is to be filed. Most U.S. law firms have a network of foreign &#8220;associates&#8221;, or law firms in other countries that they work with when something needs to be filed in another country.</p>
<p>These foreign associates are familiar with the local rules and will be sure to place your application in the appropriate format before it is filed. Your U.S. attorney, who is familiar with your circumstances and with the corresponding U.S. application, will generally continue to control the foreign application for you, acting through their foreign associate.</p>
<h4><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Foreign Trademark Application Priority</span></h4>
<p>If your foreign application is filed within six months of your application in the U.S./your country of origin, it will generally be entitled to the priority of your U.S. application and assigned a priority filing date. That means the application will be examined as if it were filed on the same date as the U.S. application. Most countries are members of treaties that provide for this priority claim, however not all are. The foreign associate will know whether a claim of priority is appropriate.</p>
<h4><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Foreign Trademark Application Examination</span></h4>
<p>Trademark application are generally subjected to less rigorous examination in countries other than the U.S. Many countries do not have a rule against descriptive trademarks and allow very broad listings of goods and services.</p>
<h4><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Costs of Foreign Trademark Applications</span></h4>
<p>Filing individual trademark applications in ever foreign country of interest can be expensive. In addition to each country&#8217;s filing fees, you pay for two levels of attorneys, your U.S. attorney and the foreign associate. Typical costs can be $1,500 per country just to get the application filed.</p>
<p>Any questions about protecting trademarks in foreign countries? Let me know in the comments.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://patents101.com/2009/08/protect-trademarks-foreign-countries-madrid/" target="_blank">On to Part 2</a></strong> (International Applications Under the Madrid System)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://patents101.com/2009/07/protect-trademarks-foreign-countries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
