<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Patents101 &#187; trademark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patents101.com/tag/trademark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patents101.com</link>
	<description>Patents101, Hyra IP&#039;s Patents Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:06:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>What is the Trademark Registration Application and Examination Process Like?</title>
		<link>http://patents101.com/2009/02/what-is-the-trademark-registration-application-and-examination-process-like/</link>
		<comments>http://patents101.com/2009/02/what-is-the-trademark-registration-application-and-examination-process-like/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clifford D. Hyra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statement of use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark examination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark examiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark renewal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark specimen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patents101.com/?p=202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Are you interested in registering your trademark or service mark?  Want to know a little about how the process works?  Here is a short overview, from the initial search and application through allowance and registration.
Registrability Search and Initial Application
To register a trademark or service mark, you will first need to identify what the mark is. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- 	 	 --></p>
<p>Are you interested in registering your trademark or service mark?  Want to know a little about how the process works?  Here is a short overview, from the initial search and application through allowance and registration.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Registrability Search and Initial Application</span></p>
<p>To register a trademark or service mark, you will first need to identify what the mark is.  If the mark includes a graphic element (in other words, it is not just plain words) you will need a high quality reproduction of the mark in computer or paper format. You will also need a list of all the goods and services for which the mark is used or will be used.</p>
<p>If the mark is already in use, it is important that this list is accurate, as a misstatement could result in your trademark being invalidated.  Often I can come up with a draft list based on materials supplied by a client (such as a website), which I then go over with my client and change as necessary.</p>
<p>With this information, a registrability search can be performed, if so desired.  You can try to do this search yourself, searching the PTO database for similar marks for similar goods or services, or you can have a trademark attorney perform it.  The attorney can also render an opinion on the registrability of your mark if you desire. In this process,  the United States Patent and Trademark Office&#8217;s trademark register is examined to see if any existing trademark applications or registrations would prevent registration of your mark.</p>
<p>When I conduct a registrability search, I also perform an internet search for any unregistered users of similar marks that could cause you problems down the road.  I typically recommend a registrability search prior to filing an application. If conflicting marks are found, your mark can be modified to avoid them without the wasted time and expense of a full application.</p>
<p>To proceed with your application, you will also need to know the name of the owner of the mark, which may be you or your company, and the owner&#8217;s mailing and email address as well as phone and fax number (if applicable).</p>
<p>If your mark has <span style="text-decoration: underline;">not</span> yet been used in interstate commerce (used on goods shipped across state lines or to advertise services) an intent-to-use application will be filed and no further information will be necessary for the time being.  If the mark has been used, your lawyer will need to know the date that the mark was first used anywhere and the date it was first used in interstate commerce, and will also need a specimen showing how the mark is used.</p>
<p>To show use on goods, the specimen may be a photograph showing the mark on the goods, or packaging or shipping materials for the goods, or a tag or label.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">For services only</span>, the specimen may be an advertisement (website printouts usually make good specimens). An advertisement is not an acceptable specimen to show use of a trademark on goods/products. Under certain circumstances, a catalog or &#8220;point of sale&#8221; display may also serve as a specimen for goods.  Please contact your lawyer if you have any question about the suitability of a specimen.</p>
<p>Preparing and filing your application to register your trademark entails a government fee of $325 <a title="Trademark Classes" href="http://www.uspto.gov/go/tac/doc/basic/international.htm">per class</a> of goods or services in addition to whatever your attorney charges for his or her services.  Many applications fall under a single class.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Examination of Your Application</span></p>
<p>Your application will be picked up by a Trademark Examiner about three to six months after your application is filed.  Many times, your application will be approved by the Examiner and passed to publication without the necessity for any changes.  Other times, the Examiner may send out an Office Action requiring changes to your application to comply with certain formalities.  The Examiner may also cite other registrations or pending applications that he or she feels prevent registration of your mark, or give other reasons that your mark is not registrable in the opinion of the Examiner.</p>
<p>If an Office Action is sent, it must be replied to within six months. There is no government fee on top of the amount you will be charged by your attorney for his or her services in preparing and filing the Response.  If the Examiner still is not satisfied, a second Office Action may be sent.  At that point you must meet all the Examiner&#8217;s requirements or appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board or risk abandonment of your application.  In some cases, registration of your mark may be refused.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Publication and Allowance of Your Application</span></p>
<p>After your application is accepted, it will be published in the Official Gazette of the Unites States Patent and Trademark Office.  This publication places all other trademark holders on notice that your mark is about to be registered and gives them one month to oppose your registration.  If your registration is not opposed, the mark will be allowed and, in the case of marks currently in use, officially registered.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Statement of Use (Intent-to-use applications)</span></p>
<p>If your application was filed on an intent-to-use basis, a Statement of Use must be filed within six months of allowance, along with a specimen showing use of the mark in interstate commerce, before registration will occur. A Statement of Use carries a government fee of $100 per class.</p>
<p>If the mark is not yet in use by this time, you can request an extension of time to file the Statement of Use.  Up to five extensions may be requested, each of which grants you an additional six months in which to use the mark and file a Statement of Use.  Each extension carries a government fee of $150/class in addition to whatever your attorney charges for this service.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Combined Declaration of Use and Incontestability</span></p>
<p>Five years after your mark is registered, you must file a statement of continued use and incontestability under Sections 8 and 15. The government fee is $300 per class.  Incontestability, granted after five years of registration, is a powerful advantage for your mark in court and grants you extra leverage in negotiations with infringers or for licensing and sales.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Renewals</span></p>
<p>If you wish to keep your trademark registration active, you must file a Renewal of Registration nine and a half years after registration and every ten years thereafter.  The government fee is $500 per class on top of your attorney&#8217;s service charge</p>
<p>Generally, your trademark lawyer will keep all of the relevant dates for your trademarks in a calendar and docketing system.  That means you should never have to worry about missing an important deadline and allowing your trademark to lapse.  This service is typically included in the cost of filing renewals, etc.</p>
<p align="left">If you have any questions to ask about the trademark registration process or anything to add, please do so in the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://patents101.com/2009/02/what-is-the-trademark-registration-application-and-examination-process-like/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is my trademark being infringed?  Am I infringing someone else&#8217;s trademark?</title>
		<link>http://patents101.com/2009/02/is-my-trademark-being-infringed-am-i-infringing-someone-elses-trademark/</link>
		<comments>http://patents101.com/2009/02/is-my-trademark-being-infringed-am-i-infringing-someone-elses-trademark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clifford D. Hyra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademark Infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancellation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confusing similarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confusingly similar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DuPont factors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[likelihood of confusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark infringement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patents101.com/?p=190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is trademark infringement?  Without knowing that, you cannot evaluate whether you may be infringing on someone else&#8217;s mark or whether someone may be infringing on yours.  Once you have a registered trademark, the question of what constitutes trademark infringement becomes of greater concern.
You have put some time and money into coming up with your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is trademark infringement?  Without knowing that, you cannot evaluate whether you may be infringing on someone else&#8217;s mark or whether someone may be infringing on yours.  Once you have a registered trademark, the question of what constitutes trademark infringement becomes of greater concern.</p>
<p>You have put some time and money into coming up with your trademark, registering it, perhaps designing an advertising campaign around it and placing it on your packaging.  Now, you want to defend it against infringers and you want to avoid having to change it due to the infringement allegations of another.  Because a mark cannot be registered if it infringes on another registered mark, infringement may be a grounds for someone seeking to prevent or cancel your registration using a notice of opposition or petition for cancellation.</p>
<h2><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Confusing Similarity</span></h2>
<p>The test for whether one mark infringes on another is whether the marks are confusingly similar.  A major purpose of trademark law is consumer protection.  If two marks are confusingly similar, a consumer may be confused into believing that two different products or services are provided by the same business, when in fact they are provided by different businesses. Thus, the consumer may expect a certain quality previously experienced with regard to the products of one business, only to be disappointed to find it lacking.  This may lead to a loss of goodwill for the business the consumer believes (erroneously) to be producing the disappointing product.</p>
<p>If the marks are confusingly similar, the mark with priority (earliest use) is being infringed.  To determine whether two marks are confusingly similar, the courts have developed a multi-factor test.  Not all courts use the exact same factors, but the factors are generally very similar.  The test used at the Federal Circuit has 13 factors (known as the <em>DuPont</em> factors):</p>
<ol>
<li>The similarity or dissimilarity of the marks in their entirety as to appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression.</li>
<li>The similarity or dissimilarity and nature of the goods . . . described in an application or registration or in connection with which a prior mark is in use.</li>
<li>The similarity or dissimilarity of established, likely-to-continue trade channels.</li>
<li>The conditions under which and buyers to whom sales are made, i.e. &#8220;impulse&#8221; vs. careful, sophisticated purchasing.</li>
<li>The fame of the prior mark</li>
<li>The number and nature of similar marks in use on similar goods.</li>
<li>The nature and extent of any actual confusion.</li>
<li>The length of time during and the conditions under which there has been concurrent use without evidence of actual confusion.</li>
<li>The variety of goods on which a mark is or is not used . . . .</li>
<li>The market interface between the applicant and the owner of a prior mark . . .</li>
<li>The extent to which applicant has a right to exclude others from use of its mark on its goods.</li>
<li>The extent of potential confusion . . . .</li>
<li>Any other established fact probative of the effect of use.</li>
</ol>
<p>These factors are taken together and considered as a whole.  They are not given equal weight and any one factor may dominate in a given case.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Similarity In Appearance, Sound, Connotation, and Commercial Impression</span></p>
<p>The first DuPont factor is the most important.  If the marks are not similar in any way, none of the other factors are going to matter.  A court will look at how long or short the marks are and how many syllables they have, whether they contain the same words with the same meanings, how they would be pronounced, etc.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Similarity of the Goods</span></p>
<p>The second, and probably next most important factor, is the similarity of the goods or services on which each mark is used.  The key question is whether consumers are likely to be confused by the similarity of the marks.  If the types of goods on which each mark is used vary dramatically, confusion is less likely.  A consumer would not expect a tire manufacturer, for example, to also make cosmetics.  So if there were two similar marks, but one was used on tires and one on face cream, that might not be confusing to a consumer.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Similarity of Trade Channels</span></p>
<p>How are the goods or services associated with each mark sold and distributed?  If both sets of goods are sold in the same types of stores to the same types of people, confusion is more likely.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Sophistication of Buyers and Conditions Under Which Sales Are Made</span></p>
<p>Although sophistication could cut both ways, generally it is considered to make confusion less likely.  If the goods are industrial equipment and the purchasers are experts in such equipment who carefully evaluate the goods before purchase, it is less likely they will be confused by a similarity between two marks.  They have taken the time to evaluate who is selling the goods and what the goods are.</p>
<p>In contrast, retail sales to the general public may be &#8220;impulse&#8221; purchases, made without careful consideration.  Such buyers may have little knowledge of the goods they are buying and may be easily confused by two similar marks, which they do not consider carefully.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Fame of Prior Mark</span></p>
<p>This could also cut both ways (a customer might be very familiar with a very famous mark and might be unlikely to confuse it with a small shop, etc.) but is generally considered to make confusion more likely.  Consumers are more likely to be aware of a famous mark and to expect to see it and to have certain expectations about products with that mark.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Number and Nature of Similar Marks</span></p>
<p>If the industry is &#8220;crowded&#8221; with many similar marks for similar products, confusion is less likely.  A consumer will be used to seeing different similar marks for similar products and will not necessarily make the connection that two different but similar marks must come from the same source.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Actual Confusion</span></p>
<p>Any instances of actual confusion by consumers will suggest that the marks are confusingly similar.  If consumers are complaining to the wrong business about the quality of the product, or calling the wrong business for technical support, or contacting the wrong business to ask if they are the source of a product, based on the trademark, those are instances of actual confusion.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Length of Concurrent Use Without Actual Confusion</span></p>
<p>If two marks have been in use at  the same time over an extended period and there have been no instances of actual consumer confusion, that is an indication that the marks are not in fact confusingly similar.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Variety of Goods On Which a Mark is Used</span></p>
<p>If a mark is only used on one type of goods, for example only tires, it is less likely that a consumer will believe that a different type of goods is made by the same business, even if the trademark is similar (think about my earlier tires/cosmetic example).  In contrast, if a mark is used on a wide variety of goods, confusion may be more likely, as a consumer will more readily believe that a different type of product is made by the same company.  For example, if the mark were used on both tires, and toys and accessories, maybe use of the mark on cosmetics would be a little less unbelievable.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Market Interface Between Applicant and Owner of Prior Mark</span></p>
<p>This factor looks at how the two mark holders have interacted in the marketplace.  Has the prior owner consented to the use of the other mark owner?  This may suggest a lack of confusion.  Have they agreed to take steps to minimize the potential confusion for consumers, for example by agreeing to continue using each mark only for certain goods, or in certain areas, or with certain marketing limitations?  This may help to avoid confusion, but it could also indicate the possibility for such confusion.  Has the prior owner failed to take steps to prevent the other owner from registering or using the mark?  That may indicate a lack of confusion.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Right of Applicant to Exclude Others</span></p>
<p>Does the applicant have a long-standing and well-known trademark associated with a specific type of goods?  This may weigh in favor of finding no confusion and allowing registration of the application, to avoid the confusion that would result from others taking advantage of the applicant&#8217;s goodwill and inability to protect their trademark.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Extent of Potential Confusion</span></p>
<p>Is any confusion likely to me &#8220;de minimus&#8221;, or minor and unimportant?  Or will there be substantial confusion that can cause real problems?  Will consumers believe they will be getting one thing but instead get another?  Will they be calling the wrong company for technical support, etc.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://patents101.com/2009/02/is-my-trademark-being-infringed-am-i-infringing-someone-elses-trademark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why should I register my trademark?</title>
		<link>http://patents101.com/2009/02/why-should-i-register-my-trademark/</link>
		<comments>http://patents101.com/2009/02/why-should-i-register-my-trademark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 19:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clifford D. Hyra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[service mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[service marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark registration application]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patents101.com/?p=135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are using a trademark in your business, for example as a slogan or to identify your business or one of your product lines, it is best to register it with the Unites States Patent and Trademark Office right away.  In fact, ideally you would search the federal trademark register and apply for registration [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are using a trademark in your business, for example as a slogan or to identify your business or one of your product lines, it is best to register it with the Unites States Patent and Trademark Office right away.  In fact, ideally you would search the federal trademark register and apply for registration <em>before</em> you begin using your trademark.  Why?  Because federal registration carries with it a number of important benefits and helps to avoid big headaches.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Build Your Brand &amp; Improve Your Professional Image</span></p>
<p>Registering your trademark allows you to use the ® symbol.  Using the registration symbol wherever you use your trademark helps to establish you as a professional in the minds of your customers and potential customers.  The registration symbol shows that you have invested in your brand identity and will be around for the long haul.  Trademark registration puts you in the company of the biggest, most successful companies, who regularly use the ® symbol in their marketing and advertisements.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Avoid Expensive Mistakes</span></p>
<p>As a best practice, you should never decide on any important slogan or other trademark without first researching the marks on the federal register.  What you want to avoid is adopting a new logo, putting it on all your packaging and advertising, rolling it out with a new marketing campaign, and then discovering that another company has already registered a similar trademark on the federal register.</p>
<p>That would mean, at a minimum, great difficulty registering your own trademark in the future and obtaining all the important benefits that come with registration.  Worse, it may result in confrontation with the other company at some point down the road when they become aware of your competing logo.  It could even mean an expensive lawsuit.</p>
<p>You could change your logo, and in the end you might have to.  But that would require coming up with a new logo, redoing your packaging and advertising, and maybe even coming up with a whole new marketing plan.  Any way you slice it, it&#8217;s an expensive mistake.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Gain Broader Nationwide Protection</span></p>
<p>Without federal registration, use of a trademark in commerce gives rise to common-law protection (against others using your trademark) at the state level in the region in which the trademark is used.  Federal registration protects your mark nationwide and prevents others from registering your mark or a confusingly similar mark.  Federal registration also gives you a greater scope of protection, covering not only the specific products or services with which you are using the mark, but also related products and services.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Gain Additional Remedies Against Infringers</span></p>
<p>Federal registration of your trademark provides official nationwide notice to potential infringers of your exclusive right to use your trademark.  Federal registration thus gives you the right to file suit in federal court and to recover profits or damages from other businesses that infringe on your trademark by offering their goods or services under a similar mark. It also gives you remedies in court that are more costly to an infringer, including triple damages and attorney&#8217;s fees in cases of willful or malicious infringement.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Make Your Mark Stronger in Litigation</span></p>
<p>Your federal trademark registration acts as <em>prima facie</em> evidence that your mark and registration are valid, that you own the mark, and that you have an exclusive right to use your mark in commerce in connection with your goods and services.</p>
<p>After five years of registration, your trademark becomes incontestable after filing an affidavit with the Trademark Office.  After that point, an infringer or other person who challenges your mark cannot base their challenge on the most common allegations- that your trademark is confusingly similar to another mark or not inherently distinctive.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Register Your Trademarks and Service Marks</span></p>
<p>These benefits give your trademark great strength in negotiations with potential purchasers, licensees, and infringers.  Therefore, registration is always recommended.  To register your mark, it must meet the registrability requirements of the Trademark Office and you must use or intend to use your mark in interstate commerce.  As a rough guideline, for goods, use in interstate commerce means shipment of your goods across state lines while they bear your trademark. For services, use in interstate commerce means providing a service across state lines.  To discuss the registration of your trademarks, contact a trademark attorney for a free consultation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://patents101.com/2009/02/why-should-i-register-my-trademark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A cybersquatter registered a domain name similar to my trademark- what can I do?</title>
		<link>http://patents101.com/2009/01/cyber-squatter-registered-domain-name-similar-to-my-trademark/</link>
		<comments>http://patents101.com/2009/01/cyber-squatter-registered-domain-name-similar-to-my-trademark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clifford D. Hyra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Name Disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain name arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain name dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UDRP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patents101.com/?p=78</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cybersquatting is a common problem.  Many times a business will use a trademark for years before realizing that a cybersquatter has registered a corresponding domain name and is now sitting on it hoping to get paid to transfer it back to the rightful owner.  The domain name may be identical to a trademark (www.trademark.com or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cybersquatting is a common problem.  Many times a business will use a trademark for years before realizing that a cybersquatter has registered a corresponding domain name and is now sitting on it hoping to get paid to transfer it back to the rightful owner.  The domain name may be identical to a trademark (www.trademark.com or www.trademark.net) or a misspelling or mistyping of the trademark (www.traedmark.com, etc.).</p>
<p>In one situation a client of mine (a large organization) had registered www.theirtrademark.org, but had not registered any other spellings or domain name extensions.  Needless to say, there was a long list of similar domain names that had been registered by others- www.theirtrademark.com, www.theirtradmark.com, www.theirtrademark.net, etc., etc.</p>
<p>A good way to avoid this is to go ahead and register all the different domain name extensions when you first start using the trademark- they cost about $10/year.  But no matter what you do, someone could always come up with a creative domain name that is confusingly similar to your trademark to profit from your brand. What do you do in that situation?</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">uDRP</span></p>
<p>Well, there is a solution that is somewhat expensive (much more than $10/yr!) but much less expensive than litigation.  This method is to file an arbitration complaint under the Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (uDRP).  Every registrar and registrant must agree to this policy and is bound by it.  You file a complaint with one of the designated arbitration organizations and an arbitration panel decides whether the domain name is confusingly similar to your trademark and was registered in bad faith.  If so, the arbitration panel can award the domain to you and the registrar (GoDaddy.com, or the like) automatically transfers the domain from the cybersquatter to you.</p>
<p>The lowest arbitration panel fee is about $1300 and you can add to that whatever your attorney charges you to prepare the complaint.  The entire process from complaint to transfer can be completed in a few months.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Negotiation</span></p>
<p>Since the total cost may run to $3000 or more including attorney&#8217;s fees, you may be able to save some money negotiating with the cybersquatter/registrant directly.  You should be able to contact the registrant using the whois information for the domain.  Often, especially in egregious cases, it is possible to negotiate a transfer for less than the cost of arbitration.</p>
<p>Usually, I contact the registrant, identify myself as a lawyer representing the trademark owner, and politely explain the situation and that the owner of a registered trademark is legally entitled to the use of a corresponding domain name.  I then request that the domain be transferred without mentioning any fee.  Often this is effective and you will get your domain back practically free! Other times, a payment may be required.</p>
<p>So I again recommend identifying domain names you may be interested in early on and registering them.  Otherwise, it might cost you a few thousand dollars to acquire each one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://patents101.com/2009/01/cyber-squatter-registered-domain-name-similar-to-my-trademark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
